There also was a CEO of a hardware security company that came out and said that his firm had found an implanted chip during an audit. IIRC, he was convinced that it was very unlikely to be limited to Supermicro hardware.
> he was convinced that it was very unlikely to be limited to Supermicro hardware
Yep. This was why there was a significant movement around mandating Hardware BOMs in both US and EU procurement in the early 2020s.
Also, the time period that the Bloomberg story took place was the late 2000s and early 2010s, when hardware supply chain security was much less mature.
I wonder what impact that kind of publicity had on their firms’ business…
I’m sure a brief glance at his shares and the company’s share price was enough to convince him that the “problem” was unlikely to be limited to just SuperMicro.
Amazing coincidence that his company could help others find out if they were impacted!
