Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If a piece of code does not panic in panic=unwind, then it does not panic in panic=abort either. So having coverage of panic=unwind would be sufficient to guarantee that code cannot panic. The caveat you mention with panic=abort would only apply to code that is unable to build for panic=unwind, which is uncommon.


Oh, then I misremembered and misunderstood the note, my apologies

On that note, thank you for all your work!




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: