Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I trust humans more than LLM's. They're like whatever was most popular mixed with hallucinations. I can gauge human credibility better.

I usually search for specific terms, often in quotes. My extra terms are variations on how people might word the question or answer.

Over time, I notice many sites are reliable for specific topics. I'll use site: operator to limit the search to them initially. If it's a research paper, adding "paper" and PDF usually links to it immediately. If government, it's often on a .gov page. And so on.

Search works well for me with these techniques for most of my needs. There has certainly even a drop in quality, with an increase in work, due to them optimizing for what generates ad clicks. That gives me a lot of sites that appear to be helpful but actually arent. I can usually spot and weed them out in one session for a given topic, though, since click farm sites are recognizable (intuitable) once you're used to them.

Finally, I try to follow the law since my Savior, Jesus Christ, requires it where possible. A.I.'s are usually trained with massive copyright infringement with outputs that may be copyright infringement. Search engines link me to the content creator to use directly. The creator also often says if they want it shared or how which I try to respect when I see it mentioned.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: