I did think of sour grapes (only thing that came to my mind) and was hoping for something better. Sour grapes doesn't seem too interesting. I think most people can tell you, if you actually ask them, what the differences between their actual successes and their wildest dreams are. But any improvement is still a success and I think that's valid.
The milliken oil drop experiment, “winning “ the space race, mostly anything C levels will tell the board and shareholders at a shareholder meeting, the American wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, most of what Sam Altman or Elon musk has to say, this list continues.
I think you're approaching it form very high level, when you should think about it from much lower level, i.e. success is being determined by stress/dopamine hormones or similar
This article is kind of vague on that tbf:
To conclude, we observed no credible evidence for a beneficial effect of L-dopa (vs. Haloperidol) on reinforcement learning in a reward context, as well as the proposed mechanistic account of an enhanced striatal prediction error response mediating this effect.
Is that controversial? I would say everything a human does is to feel better, and everything someone does that doesn’t make them feel better immediately is just done in the expectation of even greater pleasure later.
Well mine can, with some tactics and strategy layered on top. If I do something I don’t like, I only do it because the payoff later makes it worth it (or at least I think it will from my current knowledge).
It is important that “profit”, comes in various forms, which exchange rates are problematic to calculate (or maybe there can’t be any): not hungry, not thirsty, tastes good, not cold, feel safe, feel excited, feel righteous, feel powerful, listen to music, watch a movie, get curious, satisfy curiosity, laugh, love, sex, rock n roll.
Most behavior we believe is some kind of rational action when it is really blind actions based on fiction or just completely random with rationalizations for the behavior after the fact.
