Enforcing the laws unequally is unjust, and is the reason why having overbroad, overcomplicated and widely violated but rarely enforced laws is a mechanism of injustice.

But large corporations typically have lawyers and then comply with the law, even while doing something you might not think they ought to be doing. Conniving of a way to get them anyway, instead of changing the law so it does what you intend, is either that same injustice (selective prosecution for a different offense than the thing that made you dislike them) or the overt despotism of making up the rules as you go along. There is really very little daylight between the two of them except that people seem a lot more inclined to go along with the first one when it gets them the outcome they want.